Research Sketch: Royle, Steinhauer, Dessureault, Herbay & Brambati (2019)

Aging and language: Maintenance of inflectional morphological representations in older adults

 CORRESPONDING AUTHOR

Phaedra Royle

Université de Montréal

phaedra.royle@umontreal.ca

 KEYWORDS

aging, inflection morphology, masked priming, lexical decision, lexical semantics, orthographic processing, French

 APA CITATION

Royle, P., Steinhauer, K., Dessureault, E., Herbay, A., & Brambati, S. (2019). Aging and language: Maintenance of inflectional morphological representations in older adults. Frontiers in Communication, 4. doi:10.3389/fcomm.2019.00016

 ARTICLE URL

https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fcomm.2019.00016/full

 

 

 

HIGHLIGHTS

  • Morphological priming is not the summation of orthographic and semantic priming effects
  • Young adults show stronger morphological priming effects than orthographic ones
  • Older adults show equal morphological and orthographic priming effects
  • Healthy older adults maintain robust lexical representations despite subtle signs of cognitive slowing

ABSTRACT

Studies employing primed lexical decision tasks have revealed morphological facilitation effects in children and young adults. It is unknown if this effect is preserved or diminished in older adults. In fact, only few studies have investigated age-related changes in morphological processing and results are inconsistent across studies. To address this issue, we investigated inflection morphology compared to orthographic and semantic processing in young and older adults. Twenty-six adults aged 60–85 and 22 younger adults aged 19–28 participated. We probed verb recognition using a sandwich-masked primed lexical decision paradigm. We investigated lexical decision using different prime presentation times (PPTs) (33, 66, and 150ms), and prime types with priming conditions involving orthographic (e.g., cassis—CASSE ‘blackcurrant—break’), regular inflection morphological (cassait—CASSE ‘broke—break’), and semantic primes (brise—CASSE ‘break—break’) and their controls, while measuring response accuracy and reaction times. Response accuracy analyses revealed that older participants performed at ceiling on the lexical decision task, and that accuracy levels were higher compared to young adults. Reaction-time data revealed effects of age group, priming condition, and an interaction of age group and morphological priming, but no PPT effects. Both young and older adults presented a significant facilitation effect (reduced reaction times) in the orthographic and morphological priming conditions. No semantic effects were observed in either group. Younger adults also showed a significantly stronger morphological priming effect, while older adults showed no difference between orthographic and morphological priming when comparing priming magnitudes. These findings suggest (1) that regular inflectional morphological processing benefits lexical access in younger French adults, confirming studies in other languages, and (2) that this advantage is reduced at older ages.

Comments are closed.